Ex parte GROSE - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.            
                                                                  Paper No. 24         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                      ____________                                     
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                      ____________                                     
                                Ex parte CRAIG R. GROSE                                
                                      ____________                                     
                                  Appeal No. 1999-2211                                 
                               Application No. 08/620,427                              
                                      ____________                                     
                                        ON BRIEF                                       
                                      ____________                                     
          Before BARRETT, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           


                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                 
          the examiner’s final rejection of claims 7, 8, and 10.  Claims               
          11-18 have been allowed .1                                                     


                                      BACKGROUND                                       





               1An amendment (Paper No. 15, filed May 8, 1998) submitted subsequent to 
          the final rejection was entered by the examiner (Paper No. 16, mailed May 20,
          1998).                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007