Ex parte BLAESER et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 14              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                              Ex parte DAVID J. BLAESER                               
                                and RYAN A. JURGENSON                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-2285                                  
                               Application 08/826,277                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before JERRY SMITH, LALL and DIXON, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 25-34, which                        
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.  An                 
          amendment after final rejection was filed on October 23, 1998               
          and was entered by the examiner.                                            
          The disclosed invention pertains to the field of                            

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007