Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte PENDSE et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2001 > Ex parte PENDSE et al. - Page 1

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 14              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                Ex parte AJIT PENDSE                                  
                                and GREGORY H. KISOR                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-2304                                  
                               Application 08/667,242                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before JERRY SMITH, GROSS and BARRY, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-26, which constitute              
          all the claims in the application.                                          
          The disclosed invention pertains to the field of                            
          multi-point electronic conference scheduling.  More                         
          particularly, the invention facilitates selective access by                 

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007