Ex Parte PROVITOLA - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                                                                                      Paper No. 20            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                    Ex parte ANTHONY ITALO PROVITOLA                                          
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2002-0030                                             
                                           Application No. 09/314,267                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
            NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 3,         
            5, 7 to 13, 15, 17, 18 and 20.  Claims 4, 6, 14, 16 and 19 have been objected to as               
            depending from a non-allowed claim.  The appellant appeals only claims 1, 2, 5, 7 to              
            12, 15, 17 and 20.  The appellant does not appeal from the final rejection of claims 3,           
            13 and 18.                                                                                        


                   We REVERSE and REMAND.                                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007