Ex Parte KARPEN - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                               
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                                              Paper No. 16                 
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                         Ex parte DANIEL NATHAN KARPEN                                                     
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                                 Appeal No. 2001-1918                                                      
                                               Application No. 09/096,999                                                  
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                     ____________                                                          
              Before JERRY SMITH, DIXON, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    




                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                          
              rejection of claims 1-16, which are all the claims in the application.                                       
                     We affirm.                                                                                            














Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007