Ex Parte REYNOLDS et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               

                                                                     Paper No. 36                           

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                             _______________                                                
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                             _______________                                                
                           Ex Parte HERBERT M. REYNOLDS, ROBERT KERR,                                       
                              RAYMOND BRODEUR, KHALDOUN RAYES,                                              
                                   DOUGLAS NEAL and YUNTAO CUI                                              
                                             _______________                                                
                                           Appeal No. 2002-0586                                             
                                           Application 08/949,213                                           
                                             _______________                                                
                                                ON BRIEF                                                    
                                             _______________                                                
            Before WALTZ, DELMENDO and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                      
            JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                  
                                  Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                                  
                   Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims          
            1 to 6, 8 to 10 and 12 to 32.1,2  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.                   
                                           CITED REFERENCE                                                  


                    1  According to Appellants, claims 7 and 11 contain allowable subject matter.  (Brief, p. 2).
                    2    In rendering our decision we have considered Appellants’ position present in the Brief,
             filed July 23, 2001 and the Reply Brief, filed October 01, 2001.                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007