Ex Parte SCHWERDTFEGER et al - Page 1




                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                         
                                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                                                                                                           Paper No. 17               

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                            ____________                                                              
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                            ____________                                                              
                                         Ex parte RICHARD SCOTT SCHWERDTFEGER                                                         
                              JAMES WINTHROP THATCHER and LAWRENCE FRANK WEISS                                                        
                                                            ____________                                                              
                                                        Appeal No. 2002-0653                                                          
                                                     Application No. 09/121,747                                                       
                                                            ____________                                                              
                                                              ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                            ____________                                                              
               Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
               HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 

                                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 44.                                             
                       The disclosed invention relates to an interactive display interface, and means for dynamically                 
               storing a database model of the data content of the display interface.                                                 
                       Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                     
                       1.  A computer controlled display system with an interactive display interface comprising:                     


                       means for dynamically storing a database model of the data content of said display interface,                  
                       means in said database model for sensing displayed data content in said interface, and                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007