Ex Parte LEIFER et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                            Paper No. 16              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                    Ex parte KALIN LEIFER and ELROY SCHOENBECK                        
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2002-1067                                  
                             Application No. 09/358,666                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                     ON BRIEF                                         
                                   _______________                                    
          Before COHEN, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                    

               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 1, 4-10, 13, 16-18 and 22-26.  Claims 19-21             
          have been allowed.  Claims 12, 14 and 15, the only other claims             
          in the application, have been indicated by the examiner to                  
          contain allowable subject matter, but currently stand objected to           
          until such time that they are rewritten in independent form.                
          Subsequent to the final rejection (see page 2 of the answer) the            
          examiner withdrew the rejection of claim 16 and indicated that              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007