Ex Parte YOO et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                         
                                publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                                                                                      Paper No. 12                        
                                                                                                                         
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    _____________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                    _____________                                                         
                                  Ex parte  CHUL JIN YOO, SANG GOOK KIM and                                               
                                             DANIEL YONGSUK PAHNG                                                         
                                                    _____________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 2002-1753                                                      
                                              Application No. 09/243,451                                                  
                                                   ______________                                                         
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                  _______________                                                         
              Before KRASS, BLANKENSHIP and SAADAT,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
              KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        

                     This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 8-14 and 16.                   
              Claims 2 and 15 have been canceled and claims 4-7 and 17-20 have been indicated by                          
              the examiner as being directed to allowable subject matter.                                                 
                     The invention is directed to a guidance and management system for a parking                          
              lot.  In particular, the invention uses graphical displays at various locations in a parking                



                                                            1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007