Ex Parte Hoen et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not            
          written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.            
                                                              Paper No. 14              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                         
                                      __________                                        
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                        
                                Ex parte STORRS T. HOEN                                 
                                     NAOTO KAWAMURA                                     
                                           and                                          
                                     JONAH A. HARLEY                                    
                                      __________                                        
                                 Appeal No. 2004-0111                                   
                              Application No. 09/930,098                                
                                      ___________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                         
                                      ___________                                       

          Before GARRIS, WARREN, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                   
          rejection of claims 19, 26, 27, 29-31 and 34.                                 
                                  REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM                                  
               The appellants have indicated (Brief, page 3) that, for the              
          purposes of this appeal, claims 26-27, 29-31, and 34 stand                    
          together, and claim 19 stands alone.  Consistent with this                    
          indication, we shall focus our analysis on claims 19 and 26, which            
          are reproduced (with any preceding claims from which they depend)             
          as follows.                                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007