The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHI-HWEY CHANG, YOSHITAKA UTSUMI,
GIOVANNI VANNUCCI, STEPHEN A. WILKUS
and GREGORY A. WRIGHT
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1194
Application No. 08/534,808
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, BARRETT and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-14, 16, 17 and 25-32. Claims 3, 15,
18-24 and 33 have been cancelled.
We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Appellants’ invention is directed to a method for providing
wireless transmission of information in electronic display
systems and achieving synchronization in such systems. According
to Appellants, values for bit and frame duration during a down-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007