Ex Parte EVERS et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and         
                                                 is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                                                                      Paper No. 19              
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                      Ex parte MARC FRANCOIS THEOPHILE EVERS                                                    
                                                               and                                                              
                                             ROBERTA MARGHERITA ROMANO                                                          
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                                     Appeal No. 2003-0802                                                       
                                                   Application No. 09/180,108                                                   
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                         ____________                                                           
               Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
                      This appeal involves claims 14-20, 22, and 23 which are all the claims pending in the                     
               application.  We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                  















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007