Ex Parte BICKMORE et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                            Paper No. 25             
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
                             Ex parte TIMOTHY W. BICKMORE, WILLIAM N. SCHILIT,                                       
                               ANDREAS GIRGENSOHN, and JOSEPH W. SULLIVAN                                            
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                Appeal No. 2004-0171                                                 
                                              Application No. 09/239,295                                             
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                      ON BRIEF1                                                      
                                                    ____________                                                     
             Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
             BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                    A patent examiner rejected claims 1-11, 17-20, 24, 25, 47-51, and 57-70.  The                    
             appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                      


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The invention at issue on appeal displays documents from the world-wide                          
             web ("Web") on personal digital assistants ("PDAs") and cellular telephones ("cell-                     
             phones").  According to the appellants, most documents on the Web are designed for                      



                    1An oral hearing was waived.  (Paper No. 24.)                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007