Ex Parte Ushioda et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                     Ex parte TSUTOMU USHIODA and TSUYOSHI YAHATA                     
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-0770                                 
                              Application No. 09/795,310                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before GARRIS, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s            
          final rejection of claims 1 through 6, which are the only claims            
          pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to              
          35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                            
               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                
          polypropylene composition having the advantages of good flexibility         
          and good elastic recovery where the composition comprises (1)               
          from 1 to 99% by weight of elastomeric polypropylene obtained by            
          copolymerizing propylene and an olefin other than propylene in the          
          presence of a specified catalyst and (2) from 1 to 99% by weight of         
          atactic polypropylene (Brief, page 2).  Appellants state that               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007