|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsUS CodeUS Constitution |
BUIRGE et al. V. BADYLAK et al. - Page 1Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2004 > BUIRGE et al. V. BADYLAK et al. - Page 1 Sponsored Links
.0
0
The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Paper No. 41
Mail Stop WfERFERENCE
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, USPTO
P. 0. Box 1450
Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
Tel: 571-272-9797 Fax: 571-273-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
STEPBEN F. BADYLAK, ANDREW W. BUIRGE, FAXED
PAUL J. BUSCEMI and PAUL H. BURMEISTER
Junior Party DEC 14 20
(Application 09/116,734),
V PAT& TM OFF'CE
a ARD F [;ý' TAPP
DI E
ANDREW W. BUIRGE, PAUL J. BUSCEMI
and PAUL H. BURMEISTER,
Senior Party
(Patent 5,693,085).
Patent Interference No, 105,216
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, LEE and MEDLEY, Administrative
Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judg
Judgment - Bd. Rule 127
This interference was declared on April 29, 2004. The sole issue is inventorship. The
parties agreed (see Paper 34) to have the Board enter adverse judgment against the junior party
if a joint motion to correct the inventorship of the senior party's involved patent, by adding
|