Ex Parte Park et al - Page 1



          1          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written        
          2                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                  
          3                                                                                            
          4           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
          5                            ____________________                                            
          6                                                                                            
          7                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
          8                            AND INTERFERENCES                                               
          9                            ____________________                                            
         10                                                                                            
         11                    Ex parte KI-OOK PARK, IN-EUNG KIM                                       
         12                    IN-SEOP JEONG and TAE-SEOK PARK                                         
         13                            ____________________                                            
         14                                                                                            
         15                               Appeal 2007-0112                                             
         16                        Reissue Application 09/892,7901                                     
         17                                Patent 5,917,679                                            
         18                            Technology Center 2600                                          
         19                            ____________________                                            
         20                                                                                            
         21                             Oral Argument:  None2                                          
         22                          Decided:  February 12, 2007                                       
         23                            ____________________                                            
         24                                                                                            
         25    Before:  FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and                      
         26    HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP and ALLEN R. MacDONALD,                                           
         27    Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
         28                                                                                            
         29    McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                           
         30                                                                                            

                                                                                                      
               1   Reissue application filed 28 June 2001 seeking to reissue U.S. Patent               
               5,917,679, granted 29 June 1999, based on application 08/915,342 filed                  
               22 August 1997.  The real party in interest is SamSung Electronics Co., Ltd.            
               2   Oral argument was scheduled for 21 February 2007.  In preparing for oral            
               argument, it became apparent that further action by the Examiner was                    
               required.  Accordingly, oral argument was cancelled, counsel for Appellants             
               being notified by phone 6 February 2007 of the cancellation.                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007