Ex Parte PANASIK et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                       
                                publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                                                                                    Paper No.  28                       
                                                                                                                       
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                   _____________                                                        
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   _____________                                                        
                              Ex parte CARL M. PANASIK and ANTHONY B. WOOD,                                             
                                                   _____________                                                        
                                                Appeal No. 2002-1032                                                    
                                             Application No. 08/829,278                                                 
                                                  ______________                                                        
                                               HEARD: March 13, 2003                                                    
                                                  _______________                                                       
              Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and BARRETT,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
              KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       

                                          ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                      

                     Appellants request that we reconsider our decision of March 21, 2003      wherein                  
              we affirmed the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-11, 14 and 16-23   under 35                        
              U.S.C. §103.                                                                                              
                     In particular, appellants contend that our decision is in error because we did not                 
              designate our definition of “antenna segment” as a new ground of rejection because it                     




                                                           1                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007