Ex Parte Moffett - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           

                                                                 Paper No. 18         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     

                              Ex parte ROBERT H. MOFFETT                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                  Appeal No.2003-1274                                 
                              Application No. 09/802,712                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     

          Before KIMLIN, KRATZ and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.         
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                               ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                               
               This is in response to appellant’s request for rehearing of            
          our decision mailed August 19, 2003, wherein we affirmed the                
          examiner’s decision to reject claims 1, 3, 4, 9 and 14 under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Davis in view of              
          Chung and to reject claims 10 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as            
          being unpatentable over Davis in view of Chung and Keys.                    










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007