Ex Parte FUJISAWA - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                                 Paper No. 39         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte HISANORI FUJISAWA                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-0636                                 
                              Application No. 09/045,041                              
                                     ____________                                     
                               HEARD: November 18, 2004                               
                                     ____________                                     
          Before FLEMING, GROSS, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.         
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 9 through 12, 14 through 24, 26 through 36,             
          and 38 through 44, which are all of the claims pending in this              
          application.  On page 3 of the Answer, the examiner indicates               
          that claims 19, 31, and 43 would be allowable if rewritten to               
          include all of the limitations of the base claim and any                    
          intervening claims.  Accordingly, only claims 9 through 12, 14              
          through 18, 20 through 24, 26 through 30, 32 through 36, and 38             
          through 42, and 44 remain before us on appeal.                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007