Ex Parte Bradley - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                 
               was not written for publication and is not binding                     
                            precedent of the Board.                                   

                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                          
                                _______________                                       
                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                             
                               AND INTERFERENCES                                      
                                _______________                                       
                           Ex parte JAMES S. BRADLEY                                  
                                _______________                                       
                              Appeal No. 2005-0486                                    
                           Application No. 09/887,836                                 
                                _______________                                       
                             HEARD:  April 21, 2005                                   
                                _______________                                       
          Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative                      
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                     
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                     
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 5                   
          and 11.  We dimiss the appeal of claim 12.1                                 
               Claim 1 and claim 11 are representative of the subject                 
          matter on appeal and are set forth below:                                   
               1.  A packaging laminate comprising an outer layer                     
          impermeable to a butylated phenolic antioxidant; an                         
                                                                                     
          1                                                                           
          1Claim 12 is of record, but appellant has withdrawn claim 12 from           
          consideration.  Brief, page 4.                                              




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007