Ex Parte WOHLSEN et al - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
              not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board         
                                                                Paper No.  31               

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                              
                                      _____________                                         
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                        
                                      _____________                                         
                               Ex parte ROBERT C. WOHLSEN                                   
                                     and SUE MCNEILL                                        
                                     ______________                                         
                                   Appeal No.  2005-0743                                    
                                   Application 09/351,723                                   
                                     ______________                                         
                                         ON BRIEF                                           
                                     _______________                                        
          Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.                  
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                              


                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                       
                The appellant’s have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final        
          rejection of claims 23, 25, 30, 32 and 37.  From the generic notice of            
          Appeal filed on April 7, 2003 (Paper No. 23), appellants have indicated at        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007