Stanton et al v. Dahlen et al - Page 2
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2005 > Stanton et al v. Dahlen et al - Page 2
Stanton has filed a paper requesting that judgment be entered against it. (Paper
113 at 2).
Upon consideration of the record and for reasons given, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the sole count of the
interference, is entered against junior party ERIC B. STANTON and GEORGE
JACKOWSKI;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party ERIC B. STANTON and GEORGE
JACKOWSKI is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-5 of patent 6,461,828, which
claims correspond to Count 1 (Paper 1 at 5 and Paper 106 at 1) ; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment shall be given a paper
number and entered into the administrative records of Stanton’s 6,461,828 patent and
Dahlen’s 09/835,298 application.
18 May 2005
Alexandria, VA
-2-
Page: 1 2 3
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
