Ex Parte Luft - Page 1





                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                             
                        publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     


                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                       _______________                                                             
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                       _______________                                                             
                                                     Ex Parte HEINZ LUFT                                                           
                                                       _______________                                                             
                                                     Appeal No. 2006-1149                                                          
                                                  Application No. 10/296,406                                                       
                                                       _______________                                                             
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                       _______________                                                             

                Before HAIRSTON,  JERRY SMITH and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
                JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                          



                This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of                            
                claims 10-20 which constitute all the claims pending in this application.                                          
                The disclosed invention pertains to an adapter for electrical plug-in connections on fuel                          
                injectors.                                                                                                         
                Representative claim 10 is reproduced as follows:                                                                  
                10. An adapter for connecting an electrical plug-in connector of a fuel injector to a                              
                counterplug, the adapter comprising:                                                                               
                    • a first end pluggable into the plug-in connector of the fuel injector;                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007