Ex Parte Schlosser et al - Page 1



              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                      
              written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                           _____________                                              
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                           _____________                                              
                               Ex parte MARTIN ANDREW SCHLOSSER,                                      
                            MARK JAMES BELL, MATTHEW GLEN WHEELER,                                    
                      DANIEL PATRICK MCNULTY and LELAND CHARLES LEBER                                 
                                           _____________                                              
                                       Appeal No. 2006-1166                                           
                                   Application No. 09/994,257                                         
                                          ______________                                              
                                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                          _______________                                             
            Before FRANKFORT, OWENS, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges                           
            OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                  This appeal is from a rejection of claims 1, 16, 32, 33, 50                         
            and 51.  Claims 2, 11, 20-22, 28 and 29 have been canceled.                               
            Claims 3-10, 12-15, 17-19, 23-27, 30 and 31 stand objected to as                          
            dependent upon a rejected claim but allowable if rewritten in                             
            independent form.  Claims 34-49 stand withdrawn from                                      
            consideration.                                                                            



                                                  1                                                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007