Ex Parte Bohling et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                           ____________                                              
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                           ____________                                              
                               Ex parte JAMES CHARLES BOHLING                                        
                                   MARLIN KENNETH KINZEY,                                            
                                   JOHN JOSEPH MAIKNER and                                           
                                   JAMES FRANKLIN TATE, JR.                                          
                                           ____________                                              
                                         Appeal 2006-1219                                            
                                       Application 10/636,148                                        
                                      Technology Center 1700                                         
                                           ____________                                              
                                     Decided:  October 27, 2006                                      
                                           ____________                                              

              Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                          
              GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                   

                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                    This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1 through 6 and            
              8 through 10.                                                                          
                    We REVERSE.                                                                      








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007