Ex Parte Schwalm et al - Page 1




                                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                


                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                          _______________                                                           
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                          _______________                                                           
                       Ex parte REINHOLD SCHWALM, BERND BRUCHMANN, FRANK VOLLINGER,                                                 
                                ERICH BECK, WOLFGANG SCHROF, and UWE MEISENBURG                                                     
                                                           ______________                                                           
                                                      Appeal No.  2006-1615                                                         
                                              Application No. 10/311,307                                                            
                                                          _______________                                                           
                                              HEARD: JULY 12, 2006                                                                  
                                                          _______________                                                           
               Before WALTZ, KRATZ, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     
               FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               

                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 21.  A copy of claims 1 and 21 is             
               set forth below:                                                                                                     
                       1.     A curable aqueous polyurethane dispersion, comprising:                                                
                       a)           at least one compound having at least two free isocyanate groups, at least one                  
               allophanate group and at least one C=C double bond capable of free radical                                           
               polymerization, wherein a carbonyl group or an oxygen atom in the form of an ether                                   
               function is bonded directly to the double bond,                                                                      
                       b)           at least one compound having at least one group reactive toward isocyanate groups               
               and having a C=C double bond capable of free-radical polymerization,                                                 
                       c)          optionally at least one compound having at least two groups reactive toward                      
                       isocyanate groups and selected from the group consisting of hydroxyl, mercapto,                              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007