Ex Parte M Huang et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                      
                               publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  


                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   ____________                                                        
                  Ex parte WEN LING M. HUANG, JAMES KIRCHGESSNER, and DAVID MONK                                       
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                               Appeal No. 2006-2525                                                    
                                             Application No. 10/178,672                                                
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                        
              Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                


                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection                  
              of claims 3-9, which are all the claims remaining in the application.                                    
                     We affirm.                                                                                        















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007