Ex Parte Fisher - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                               
                        written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                              

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                 ________________                                                       
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                 ________________                                                       
                                          Ex parte WILLIAM D. FISHER                                                    
                                                 ________________                                                       
                                                 Appeal 2006-2643                                                       
                                              Application 09/771,092                                                    
                                              Technology Center 1743                                                    
                                                 ________________                                                       
                                           Decided:  September 28, 2006                                                 
                                                 ________________                                                       
                 Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent                                     
                 Judges.                                                                                                
                 KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   


                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-14 and 35-42.                            
                 Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                               
                 1. A method comprising dispensing drops from a pulse jet and striking                                  
                 the pulse jet at least once, wherein the pulse jet comprises a chamber and a                           
                 thermoelectric or piezoelectric ejector in the chamber.                                                

                                                                                                                       




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007