Ex Parte Gys - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                 
            publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                               __________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               __________                                                  
                                          Ex parte LUDO GYS                                                
                                               __________                                                  
                                          Appeal No. 2006-2723                                             
            Application No. 09/891,264                                                                     
                                              ___________                                                  
                                               ON BRIEF                                                    
                                              ___________                                                  
            Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                           
            SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                  This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s                
            final rejection of claims 1-11.                                                                
                  We affirm.                                                                               
                                            BACKGROUND                                                     
                  The Appellant’s invention generally relates to a communication means                     
            connected to a communication network, and more specifically, to a method for                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007