Court Opinions
State Laws
|
Ex Parte Adapathya et al - Page 9
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2006 > Ex Parte Adapathya et al - Page 9
Appeal No. 2006-2975
Application No. 09/794,742
control the remainder of the decisional process.” Panduit Corp.
v. Dennison Mfg., 810 F.2d 1561, 1567-68, 1 USPQ2d 1593, 1597
(Fed. Cir. 1987).
We note that representative claim 1 reads in part as
follows:
[D]etermining if there is a link text string
associated with the first attribute value if the source
of the at least one first attribute value is an anchor
tag pair; storing the link text string in the index
file with its associated at least one first attribute
value if there is an associated link text string;
linking to a page URL defined by the at least one first
attribute value and parsing the code of that page for a
title tag if it was determined in step (d) that there
is no associated link text string.
We note at paragraph 33, Appellant’s specification states
the following:
Next, the source of the HREF attribute value is determined
via step 106. If the source is an anchor tag pair, it is
determined if there is a "plain English" link text string
associated with that HREF attribute, via step 108. If there is a
link text string associated with the HREF attribute, then the
link text string is stored in the index file with its
corresponding HREF attribute value, via step 110. If there is no
link text string associated with the HREF attribute value (step
108), then a link is made to the page URL defined by the HREF
attribute and the underlying code of that page is parsed for a
title tag, via step 114. Thereafter, the value of the title tag
8
Page: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
|
