Ex Parte Torres et al - Page 3

                Appeal 2006-1326                                                                              
                Application 09/919,326                                                                        

                      the sealing surface and the interior surface of the cavity when the                     
                      sleeve is subsequently inserted into the cavity; and                                    
                      wherein the molded skirt is constructed from an electrically                            
                      insulating material.                                                                    
                      9.  A method of sealing an opening of a cavity comprising the steps                     
                of:                                                                                           
                      inserting a portion of a structure through a sleeve of a sealing                        
                      assembly, the sealing assembly having a molded skirt constructed                        
                      from an electrically insulating, elastomeric material;                                  
                      inserting a section of the structure including portion of the                           
                      structure inserted through the sealing assembly into the cavity through                 
                      the cavity opening so that the molded skirt is in sealing contact with                  
                      the inside surface of the cavity wherein the molded skirt comprises a                   
                      sealing surface that has substantially the same shape as the interior                   
                      surface of the cavity prior to insertion into the cavity so that the skirt              
                      deforms only a small amount to form a seal between the sealing                          
                      surface and the interior surface of the cavity.                                         
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference as evidence                    
                of unpatentability:                                                                           
                Hayashi   US 5,540,450   Jul. 30, 1996                                                        
                      The rejection as presented by the Examiner is as follows:                               
                1.  Claims 5, 7-11, and 13-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                  
                anticipated by Hayashi.                                                                       
                   Rather than reiterate the respective positions advocated by the Appellants                 
                and by the Examiner concerning this rejection, we refer to the Brief and                      
                Reply Brief and to the Answer, respectively, for a complete exposition                        
                thereof.                                                                                      



                                                      3                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013