Ex Parte Nokelainen - Page 1



          1     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
          2             for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                  
          3                                                                                        
          4                                                                                         
          5           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
          6                                ____________                                             
          7                                                                                         
          8                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
          9                           AND INTERFERENCES                                             
         10                                ____________                                             
         11                                                                                         
         12              Ex parte RISTO PEKKA ANTERO NOKELAINEN                                     
         13                                ____________                                             
         14                                                                                         
         15                            Appeal No. 2006-1956                                         
         16                          Application No. 09/935,917                                     
         17                           Technology Center 3700                                        
         18                                ____________                                             
         19                                                                                         
         20                          Decided: February 27, 2007                                     
         21                                ____________                                             
         22                                                                                         
         23   Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and                                     
         24   ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
         25                                                                                         
         26   BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    
         27                                                                                         
         28                                                                                         
         29                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
         30                                                                                         
         31                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                            
         32         Risto Pekka Antero Nokelainen (Appellant) appeals under 35 U.S.C.               
         33    134 from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 2, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22,         
         34   23, 27, 28, 30, and  35-38.  Claims 3-10, 12, 13, 16, 18-21, 24-26, 29, and           
         35   31-34 have been withdrawn from consideration.  We have jurisdiction over              
         36   this appeal under 35 U.S.C.  6.                                                      



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013