Ex Parte Ronay - Page 14

                Appeal 2006-2351                                                                                 
                Application 10/645,493                                                                           
                Murata, (3) the § 103(a) rejection of claim 29 over Molnar I in view of                          
                Bajaj, and (4) the § 103(a) rejection of claims 30 and 31 over Molnar I in                       
                view of Cook.                                                                                    

                                                  DECISION                                                       
                       The Examiner’s rejection of claims 17-19, 21-23, 28, 33, and 36 under                     
                35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being unpatentable over Molnar I is AFFIRMED.                              
                       The Examiner’s rejection of claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                          
                being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Nishida is AFFIRMED.                                 
                       The Examiner’s rejection of claims 24-26 are rejected under                               
                35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Horie is                       
                AFFIRMED.                                                                                        
                       The Examiner’s rejection of claim 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                          
                being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Murata is AFFIRMED.                                  
                       The Examiner’s rejection of claim 29 is rejected under 35 U.S.C.                          
                § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Bajaj is                                 
                AFFIRMED.                                                                                        
                       The Examiner’s rejection of claims 30 and 31 under 35 U.S.C.                              
                § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Cook is                                  
                AFFIRMED.                                                                                        
                       The Examiner’s rejection of claim 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                          
                being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Chiddick is AFFIRMED.                                
                       The Examiner’s rejection of claims 34 and 35 under 35 U.S.C.                              
                § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Molnar I in view of Molnar II is                             
                AFFIRMED.                                                                                        



                                                       14                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013