Ex Parte Fox - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                           Ex parte ROBERT FOX                                                
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2006-2849                                                 
                                           Application 10/310,200                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided: March 23, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before TERRY J. OWENS, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and LINDA E. HORNER,                                  
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 
                OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 1-10, which are all                    
                of the pending claims.                                                                        
                                             THE INVENTION                                                    
                      The Appellant claims a vehicle wheel chocking apparatus and method.                     
                Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                      
                      1.     A wheel locking chock apparatus in alignment on one side                         
                      of a vehicle comprising:                                                                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013