Ex Parte Bussey et al - Page 3

                Appeal 2006-2859                                                                                   
                Application 11/062,725                                                                             

            1          The Examiner rejected claims 1 to 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                         
            2   unpatentable over Fuss in view of Alivizatos.                                                      
            3          The prior art relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the claims on                        
            4   appeal is:                                                                                         
            5                                                                                                      
            6   Olesen    US 3,459,179  Aug.  5, 1969                                                              
            7   Groth     US 4,566,831  Jan.  28, 1986                                                             
            8   Tate     US 5,316,149  May 31, 1994                                                                
            9   Alivizatos    US 5,618,263  Apr.   8, 1997                                                         
          10    Fuss     US 5,826,404  Oct. 27, 1998                                                               
          11                                                                                                       
          12           Appellants contend that none of the references relied on by the                             
          13    Examiner discloses a porous membrane that is deformable in three                                   
          14    dimensions to envelop an item of three-dimensional shape.  Appellants also                         
          15    contend that Tate, Alivizatos and Olesen do not disclose that the membrane                         
          16    is a net bag.  Appellants further contend that Fuss and Alivizatos do not                          
          17    disclose a membrane with self-adherent characteristics.                                            
          18                                         ISSUES                                                        
          19           The first issue is whether the Appellants have shown that the                               
          20    Examiner erred in finding that Tate, Alivizatos, Olesen, Groth, and Fuss                           
          21    disclose a porous membrane deformable in three dimensions to envelop an                            
          22    item of three-dimensional shape.                                                                   
          23           The second issue is whether the Appellants have shown that the                              
          24    Examiner erred in the finding that Tate, Alivizatos, and Olsen disclose a                          
          25    membrane that is a net bag.                                                                        
          26           The third issue is whether the Appellants have shown that the                               
          27    Examiner erred in finding that Fuss and Alivizatos disclose membranes with                         
          28    self-adherent characteristics.                                                                     

                                                        3                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013