onecle

Ex Parte Akutsu et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                Ex parte SATORU AKUTSU, TETSUNAO TAKAKI, HIDEKI MEGATA,                                      
                           TOSHINORI TANAKA, and TAKESHI SUGIYAMA                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                                           Appeal No. 2006-2965                                              
                                           Application 10/320,628                                            
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                        Decided: February 21, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT,                                                   
                and JEAN R. HOMERE,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1                      
                through 3 pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  134.  We have jurisdiction under 35                        
                U.S.C.  6(b) to decide this appeal.                                                         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013