Ex Parte Breed et al - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                              

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                          Ex parte DAVID S. BREED, WILBUR E. DUVALL, and                                          
                                          WENDELL C. JOHNSON                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2006-2983                                                   
                                            Application 10/733,957                                                
                                            Technology Center 3600                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                          Decided:  February 7, 2007                                              
                                                 ____________                                                     
             Before TERRY J. OWENS, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS and LINDA E.                                              
             HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
             HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 

                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                     
                    The Appellants seek our review of the Examiner’s final rejection of claims                    
             60, 62, and 64-68 under 35 USC § 134 (2002).  We have jurisdiction under 35                          
             USC § 6(b) (2002).                                                                                   
                                         SUMMARY OF DECISION                                                      
                    We REVERSE.                                                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013