Ex Parte Deshpande et al - Page 2

                  Appeal 2006-3143                                                                                         
                  Application 09/897,383                                                                                   
                                                  INTRODUCTION                                                             
                         The claims are directed to managing and transmitting image data.                                  
                  Specifically, the initial part of an image file is read at a client and parsed to                        
                  identify any needed additional parts to render a selection of the image file.                            
                  The requisite additional parts are then requested from the server.  The client                           
                  then displays the selection of the image file.  Such a system enables scalable                           
                  streaming of images with client-side control.  Claim 25 is illustrative:                                 
                         25.  A method for customized image display, said method comprising                                
                  the acts of:                                                                                             
                         reading an initial part of an image file at a client, said file being                             
                                hosted on a server;                                                                        
                         parsing said initial part to identify any additional parts that may be                            
                                needed to render a selection of said image file;                                           
                         requesting said additional parts from said server when said additional                            
                                parts are needed;                                                                          
                         displaying said selection of said image file at said client.                                      
                         The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                                 
                  unpatentability:                                                                                         
                  Guedalia                     US 6,356,283 B1               Mar. 12, 2002                                 
                                                                             (filed Jun. 10, 1998)                         
                  Appellants’ admitted prior art on pages 2-4 of the Specification (“APA”).                                

                         The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                                       
                         1.  Claims 25-29, 33-38, and 41 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                    
                  § 102(e) as being anticipated by Guedalia.                                                               
                         2.  Claims 30-32, 39, and 40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                              
                  as being unpatentable over Guedalia in view of APA.                                                      



                                                            2                                                              

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013