Ex Parte Hollingsworth - Page 24
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2007 > Ex Parte Hollingsworth - Page 24
Appeal 2007-0040
Application 10/170,069
Patent 6,073,699
(8)
Allocation of burden of proof
What is the proper allocation of the burden of proof in ex parte
examination?
For reasons that follow, we hold that an examiner has the burden of
making out a prima facie case of recapture. The examiner can make out a
prima facie case of recapture by establishing that the claims sought to be
reissued fall within Substeps (1) or 3(a) of Step 3 of Clement.
For reasons that follow, we also hold that once a prima facie case of
recapture is established, the burden of persuasion then shifts to the Appellant
to establish that the prosecution history of the application, which matured
into the patent sought to be reissued, establishes that a surrender of subject
matter did not occur (or that the reissue claims are materially narrowed).
As will become apparent, our rationale parallels the practice in
determining whether subject matter is surrendered when a doctrine of
equivalents analysis occurs in infringement cases.
- 24 -
Page: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
