onecle

Ex Parte Holbrook et al - Page 1





        1            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                        
        2             written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       
        3                                                                                                     
        4                                                                                                      
        5               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
        6                                      _____________                                                   
        7                                                                                                      
        8                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
        9                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
       10                                      _____________                                                   
       11                                                                                                      
       12          Ex parte GREGORY A. HOLBROOK, GRAHAM R. BROOKES, and                                        
       13                                DANIEL L. NORDMEYER                                                   
       14                                      _____________                                                   
       15                                                                                                      
       16                                    Appeal 2007-0818                                                  
       17                                  Application 10/601,448                                              
       18                                  Technology Center 3600                                              
       19                                     ______________                                                   
       20                                                                                                      
       21                                  Decided: April 10, 2007                                             
       22                                    _______________                                                   
       23                                                                                                      
       23 Before STUART S. LEVY, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and LINDA E. HORNER,                                         
       24                                                                                                      
       24 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                        
       25                                                                                                      
       26                                                                                                      
       26 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  
       27                                                                                                      
       28                                                                                                     
       29                                                                                                      
       30                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
       31                                                                                                      
       32          This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  6(b) (2002) of the final                     
       33    rejection of claims 24 through 46.  For the reasons stated infra we will not sustain              
       34    the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.                                                         
       35                                                                                                      
       36                                                                                                      



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013