Ex Parte Francois et al - Page 9

                Appeal 2007-1301                                                                                 
                Application 09/924,322                                                                           
                                          CONCLUSION OF LAW                                                      
                       Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we conclude that                       
                the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1 to 7, but not in rejecting claim 8.                     


                                                  DECISION                                                       
                       The Examiner's rejection of claims 1 to 7 is Reversed. The rejection of                   
                claim 8 is Affirmed.                                                                             
                       No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                        
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).                                   























                                                       9                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013