Ex Parte Ricci - Page 1




                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                      Ex parte DEREK ORZO RICCI                                              
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1307                                                
                                          Application 10/454,274                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                        Decided: October 22, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JOHN C. MARTIN, and ROBERT E.                                    
                NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
                HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of                      
                claims 1 to 12.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                
                      We reverse.                                                                            
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellant has invented a method that uses a data processing system                     
                for database bitmap index processing in a database management system.                        
                The data processing system uses a microprocessor with instructions for                       




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013