onecle

Ex Parte Katoh et al - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte YUSAKU KATOH and TATSUYA NORITOH                                           
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1460                                                
                                          Application 10/481,336                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: May 29, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                  
            Before WILLIAM F. PATE III, HUBERT C. LORIN, and LINDA E. HORNER,                                
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                    
            HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013