Ex Parte Flick - Page 1



                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                
                                 today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                     
                                        Ex parte KENNETH E. FLICK                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-1535                                                   
                                           Application 10/626,9691                                               
                                           Technology Center 2600                                                
                                                ____________                                                     
                                            Decided: July 30, 2007                                               
                                                ____________                                                     

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JEAN R. HOMERE, and JOHN A.                                              
                JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
                JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            
                                                                                                                
                1 The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application                   
                Ser. No. 10/264,917 filed Oct. 4, 2002, which, in turn, is a continuation-in-                    
                part of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 09/583,333 filed on May 31, 2000,                       
                which, in turn, is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application No.                         
                6,275,147, which, in turn, is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application No.                      
                6,011,460, which, in turn, is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent                              
                Application No. 5,719,551 (Specification  0001).                                                
                                                                                                                
                Furthermore, Appeal No. 2002-1784 (non-precedential) was decided in                              
                connection with the parent 09/583,333 application noted above.  Unless                           
                otherwise indicated, however, the issues decided in that case are not                            
                germane to the issues before us in the present appeal.                                           



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013