onecle

Ex Parte Saab - Page 1





        1              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                        
        2           not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   
        3                                                                                                    
        4                                                                                                    
        5               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
        6                                     _____________                                                  
        7                                                                                                    
        8                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
        9                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
       10                                     _____________                                                  
       11                                                                                                    
       12                                Ex parte MARK A. SAAB                                               
       13                                     _____________                                                  
       14                                                                                                    
       15                                 Appeal No. 2007-1580                                               
       16                               Application No. 11/017,710                                           
       17                                 Technology Center 3700                                             
       18                                    ______________                                                  
       19                                                                                                    
       20                                 Decided: July 27, 2007                                             
       21                                    _______________                                                 
       22                                                                                                    
       22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, HUBERT C. LORIN, and JENNIFER D. BAHR,                                
       23                                                                                                    
       23 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                      
       24                                                                                                    
       25                                                                                                    
       25 PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            
       26                                                                                                    
       27                                                                                                    
       28                                                                                                    
       29                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
       30                                                                                                    
       31                                                                                                    
       32                             STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
       33                This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 74 and 75.  The                
       34       other claims in the application, viz., claims 1-73, have been cancelled.  We have            
       35       jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  134 and 6(b).                                                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013