onecle

Ex Parte Muller et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  

                Ex parte MICHAEL MULLER, STEFAN BREHM and BERND KLITSCH                                      
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1588                                                
                                          Application 10/964,098                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                                          Decided: April 30, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before WILLIAM F. PATE III, TERRY J. OWENS, and                                              
                JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                WILLIAM F. PATE III, Administrative Patent Judge.                                            

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013