Ex Parte Rock - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
                                is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                        ________________                                           
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                        ________________                                           
                                   Ex parte JEFFREY A. ROCK                                        
                                        ________________                                           
                                         Appeal 2007-1687                                          
                                      Application 10/136,781                                       
                                     Technology Center 1700                                        
                                        ________________                                           
                                   Decided:  September 26, 2007                                    
                                        ________________                                           
              Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                       
              JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
              GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                 

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s decision           
              rejecting claims 1-3, 5-21, 23, 24, 26, and 28-34.  We have jurisdiction             
              under 35 U.S.C. § 6.                                                                 
                    We REVERSE.                                                                    



                                                                                                  



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013