Ex Parte Keen et al - Page 8

                  Appeal 2007-1689                                                                                           
                  Application 10/431,627                                                                                     

                  invention encompassed by appealed claims 1 through 20 would have been                                      
                  obvious as a matter of law under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                                                       
                         The Primary Examiner’s decision is affirmed.                                                        
                         No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                                  
                  this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2007).                                      
                                                       AFFIRMED                                                              










                  cam                                                                                                        
















                                                             8                                                               

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013