Ex Parte Nishikori et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not                      
                                      binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                                      Ex parte TAMAKI NISHIKORI                                              
                                             And RON DAVIS                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                                             Appeal 2007-1804                                                
                                          Application 10/885,053                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                                          Decided: July 30, 2007                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and JEFFREY T.                                   
                SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
                SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          



                                           Statement of the Case                                             
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of                      
                claims 28 and 30-32.1  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6 (2006).                      
                                                                                                            
                1 The subject matter of claims 34-38 has been allowed (Br. 5).  The subject                  
                matter of claim 33 has been objected to for being dependent upon a rejected                  
                claim (Br. 5).                                                                               
                                                                                                            



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013