Ex Parte Nishikori et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not                      
                                      binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                                      Ex parte TAMAKI NISHIKORI                                              
                                             And RON DAVIS                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                                             Appeal 2007-1804                                                
                                          Application 10/885,053                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                                          Decided: July 30, 2007                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and JEFFREY T.                                   
                SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
                SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          



                                           Statement of the Case                                             
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of                      
                claims 28 and 30-32.1  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (2006).                      
                                                                                                            
                1 The subject matter of claims 34-38 has been allowed (Br. 5).  The subject                  
                matter of claim 33 has been objected to for being dependent upon a rejected                  
                claim (Br. 5).                                                                               
                                                                                                            



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013