onecle

Ex Parte Jurgensen et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                         
                                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                      

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                     Ex parte HOLGER JURGENSEN,                                               
                                      GERHARD KARL STRAUCH                                                    
                                      AND JOHANNES KAPPELER                                                   
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-2095                                                 
                                           Application 10/378,493                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                           Decided: June 26, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and THOMAS A.                                          
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                          
                Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3 and 12.  Claims 4-11 are                     
                the only other claims pending in this application, and the Examiner has                       
                indicated that claim 11 is allowed while claims 4-10 are objected to as                       






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013